The role of ventricular disproportion, aortic, and ductal isthmus ultrasound measurements for the diagnosis of fetal aortic coarctation, in the third trimester of pregnancy.
نویسندگان
چکیده
AIM To analyze the role of ventricular disproportion, aortic, and ductal isthmus ultrasound measurements for the diagnosis of fetal aortic coarctation (AoCo) and to evaluate the prediction of a needed neonatal surgical intervention in the presence of a diagnosis of AoCo. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a prospective study on 41 fetuses (pregnancy age- 32 to 39 weeks, median 36 weeks) evaluated for left ventricle (LV) < right ventricle (RV) disproportion. Four fetuses were lost from evidence and five fetuses with complex cardiac malformations were excluded. The remaining group of 32 fetuses and newborns were evaluated. RESULTS AoCo was confirmed in 9 neonates (28.12%), all requiring surgical treatment in the neonatal period. Significant statistical differences were found in Z-score (p=0.0023) and dimensions (p=0.0029) of the aortic isthmus between the neonates with normal aorta and those with AoCo. If the values of RV/LV>1.5, Ductus/Ao isthmus >1.4, and Ao isthmus <4.2 mm are concomitantly accomplished, 83.3% of the fetuses (20 of 23) did not necessitate neonatal surgical intervention. Five of the 9 operated newborns had all three parameters with values over the threshold. The probability for required surgery is 13.87 times higher when the Ao isthmus is <4.2 mm (OR = 13.87 [95% CI = 1.88 - 102.20]). CONCLUSIONS The use of the combination between the three studied parameters with their cut-off score prediction decreases the false positive diagnosis of AoCo. The fetuses with ventricular disproportion developed only in the last trimester, had reduced chances for AoCo.
منابع مشابه
Difficult prenatal diagnosis: fetal coarctation
The prenatal diagnosis of fetal coarctation is still challenging. It is mainly suspected by ventricular disproportion (smaller left ventricle than right ventricle). The sensitivity of ventricular discrepancy is however moderate for the diagnosis of coarctation and there is a high false positive rate. Prenatal diagnosis of coarctation is important because the delivery can be arranged in a centre...
متن کاملMorphological and physiological predictors of fetal aortic coarctation.
BACKGROUND Prenatal diagnosis of aortic coarctation suffers from high false-negative rates at screening and poor specificity. METHODS AND RESULTS This retrospective study tested the applicability of published aortic arch and ductal Z scores (measured just before the descending aorta in the 3-vessel and tracheal view) and their ratio on 200 consecutive normal controls at a median of 22+/-0 ges...
متن کاملRetrospective case series examining the clinical significance of subjective fetal cardiac ventricular disproportion.
OBJECTIVE To evaluate fetal cardiac ventricular disproportion as a marker of cardiac anomalies. METHODS A retrospective case series included data from all patients who had a fetus diagnosed subjectively with ventricular disproportion by routine obstetric ultrasonography between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2013 at a single tertiary center in the USA. Fetal and neonatal echocardiography, a...
متن کاملAcute Type A Dissection and Acute Inferior MI Complicating Aortic Coarctation: A Case Report
Aortic coarctation is a rare but dangerous condition. Presence of aortic dissection in addition to coarctation is significantly rarer and more life-threatening. Here, we present a case of acute inferior MI due to aortic dissection complicating a native aortic coarctation. A 17-year-old boy was admitted to our emergency department due to severe chest pain and loss of consciousness. His ele...
متن کاملThree Different Imaging Modalities of a Patient with the Aortic Coarctation
The patient was a 19 year-old woman with the diagnosis of resistant hypertension, although she was under treatment of three classes of anti-hypertensive drugs (beta blocker, angiotensin receptor blocker, diuretic) for more than one year. In physical examination there was only a significant difference between the systolic blood pressure of upper and lower extremities (200 vs. 120 mmHg), without ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Medical ultrasonography
دوره 17 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2015